As an example of how we in the West have a special interest in understanding this region, today the New South Wales police claim to use the descriptor "of Middle Eastern appearance" as an aid to policing. I now want to raise the question, though, can a religiously, linguistically and ethnically diverse population from around 25 modern states in North Africa and West Asia now all be seen from the outside as “of Middle Eastern appearance”? Why do we think it can be?
The Middle East is generally accepted today to mean countries of West Asia and including Turkey and perhaps Egypt but for some it includes the remaining North African states today, too. Some writers include some countries of the Caucasus (the today somewhat troubled region between the Black and Caspian Seas including 'Middle Eastern' Armenia, Nakhchivan, Nagorno-Karabakh, Adjara and Azerbaijan) in their definition of the Middle East (thus up to but not including the also troubled Georgia).
Please note that places like Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sudan and Somalia may be nearby but are not officially Middle Eastern; they are linked by Islam and by regional history, of course, to the today largely Arab but also notably Persian, Turkish and Jewish Middle East. Today in fact the Middle East probably seems to many in the West to refer more or less exclusively to Israel-Palestine and to problems and enemies and friends such as enemy Saddam's Iraq, Ahmadinijad's Iran, perhaps Gaddafi's Libya and friend Israel and, cautiously, Turkey. I will seek in later posts to get behind these common views and to the true state of the region.
No comments:
Post a Comment